# State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial Commission

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 25, 1983 · 5 Ohio St. 3d 72

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6757960

## Case

- **Full name:** The State, ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 25, 1983
- **Citations:** 5 Ohio St. 3d 72; 5 Ohio B. 127; 448 N.E.2d 1372; 1983 Ohio LEXIS 731
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 61 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6757960

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- explaining that Wallace, as interpreted in Teece, “also extends to medical opinions in combined effect claims, where the examining physician only examines for one allowed condition”

## Opinion text

Clifford F. Brown, J.,
concurring. I concur in the analysis and judgment in this case, but I disapprove utilization of the meaningless “some evidence” jargon and citations related thereto, for reasons oft-stated. State, ex rel. Kilburn, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 1 Ohio St. 3d 103, 106 (dissenting opinion); State, ex rel. Allerton, v. Indus. Comm. (1982), 69 Ohio St. 2d 396, 399-400 [ 23 O.O.3d 358 ] (dissenting opinion); State, ex rel. Berry, v. Indus. Comm. (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 193, 196-198 (C. Brown, J., concurring separately).
J. P. Celebrezze, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6757960. Public record. Not legal advice.