# Bukky v. Painesville Telegraph & Lake Geauga Printing Co.

> Ohio Supreme Court · November 10, 1981 · 68 Ohio St. 2d 45

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6757386

## Case

- **Full name:** Bukky v. The Painesville Telegraph & Lake Geauga Printing Company
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** November 10, 1981
- **Citations:** 68 Ohio St. 2d 45; 22 Ohio Op. 3d 183; 428 N.E.2d 405; 7 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2309; 1981 Ohio LEXIS 616
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Holmes
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Krupansky, Locher, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 11 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6757386

## Opinion text

Holmes, J.,
dissenting. It being my conclusion that this case was inappropriate for the granting of a summary judgment, I would affirm the Court of Appeals. In my view, there yet remained issues of fact pertaining to the existence of the reckless disregard of the truth in the investigation and reporting of the items contained in the subject published article.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6757386. Public record. Not legal advice.