# State ex rel. Kynard v. Court of Common Pleas

> Ohio Supreme Court · June 11, 1980 · 62 Ohio St. 2d 308

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756894

## Case

- **Full name:** The State, ex rel. Kynard v. Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** June 11, 1980
- **Citations:** 62 Ohio St. 2d 308; 16 Ohio Op. 3d 356; 405 N.E.2d 719; 1980 Ohio LEXIS 746
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756894

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
A writ of prohibition will issue when a court seeks to exercise judicial power not authorized by law. State, ex rel. Adler, v. Court (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 1 ; State, ex rel. Wall, v. Grossman (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 4 .
Here, there is no question that the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County is authorized to hear a case charging aggravated murder. Appellant’s contentions are to the sufficiency of the indictment and not to the jurisdiction of the trial court to hear and determine the cause. Alleged irregularities in the proceedings of the grand jury returning an indictment do not deprive the lower court of jurisdiction to proceed thereunder. Appellant’s remedy is by way of appeal. Chapman v. Jago (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 51 ; Silliman v. Court (1933), 126 Ohio St. 338 .
Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals dismissing the complaint for a writ of prohibition is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756894. Public record. Not legal advice.