# Arlen v. State

> Ohio Supreme Court · February 6, 1980 · 61 Ohio St. 2d 168

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756750

## Case

- **Full name:** Arlen v. State of Ohio, State Medical Board
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 6, 1980
- **Citations:** 61 Ohio St. 2d 168; 15 Ohio Op. 3d 190; 399 N.E.2d 1251; 1980 Ohio LEXIS 631
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Herbert
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Only, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 72 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756750

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that "a party's testimony of facts subversive to his interests is alone sufficient to support a verdict"
- noting "a party's testimony of facts subversive to his interests is alone sufficient to support a verdict"

## Opinion text

Herbert, J.,
concurring. I concur in the judgment because appellee’s own statements establish his violation of the law. It is not necessary to a resolution of this cause to decide the question concerning expert testimony.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756750. Public record. Not legal advice.