# Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing Authority

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 23, 1979 · 58 Ohio St. 2d 202

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756565

## Case

- **Full name:** Dudukovich v. Lorain Metropolitan Housing Authority
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 23, 1979
- **Citations:** 58 Ohio St. 2d 202; 12 Ohio Op. 3d 198; 389 N.E.2d 1113; 1979 Ohio LEXIS 415
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Potter
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, First, Herbert, Holmes, Keeee, Keefe, Locher, Pottee, Potter, Sixth, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 402 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756565

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that if a preponderance of reliable, probative, and substantial evidence exists, the common pleas court must affirm the administrative agency’s decision
- stating that the term "filed" requires actual delivery
- noting that R.C. 2506.03 “makes liberal provision for the introduction of new or additional evidence”

## Opinion text

Potter, J.,
dissenting.
I respectfully dissent for the reasons expressed by Judge Mahoney in his dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, to wit:
“There is no right of appeal in this case. Mrs. Duduko-vich is employed by the Housing authority within the meaning of R. C. 3735.28. She serves at the pleasure of the Board. R. C. Chapter 2506.01 f.f. does not create a right of appeal for her. At best she could be considered a member of the classified civil service subject to what rights, if any, are created for her by R. C. Chapter 124.01. The judgment should be reversed and final judgment entered for the Board.”

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756565. Public record. Not legal advice.