# Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Pandilidis

> Ohio Supreme Court · February 28, 1979 · 57 Ohio St. 2d 47

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756504

## Case

- **Full name:** Cincinnati Bar Association v. Pandilidis
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 28, 1979
- **Citations:** 57 Ohio St. 2d 47; 11 Ohio Op. 3d 158; 385 N.E.2d 1317; 1979 Ohio LEXIS 363
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Connors
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebeezze, Connors, Eighth, Herbert, Holmes, Locher, Pryatel, Sixth, Sweeney
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756504

## Opinion text

Connors, J.,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the per curiam opinion, being mindful of this court’s policy beginning with, and followed thereafter in, Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Stein (1972), 29 Ohio St. 2d 77 .
The recommendation of this court’s Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline called for a public reprimand.
Heedful of this court’s policy since Stein , I nevertheless feel that, in view of the findings of facts and the report and recommendation of the board of commissioners, a public reprimand would be sufficient discipline.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6756504. Public record. Not legal advice.