# Noble v. McMaken

> Ohio Supreme Court · March 10, 1976 · 45 Ohio St. 2d 236

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755702

## Case

- **Full name:** Noble v. McMaken
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 10, 1976
- **Citations:** 45 Ohio St. 2d 236; 74 Ohio Op. 2d 379; 344 N.E.2d 129; 1976 Ohio LEXIS 566
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755702

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
In Freeman v. Maxwell (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 4 , this court held' “that-the availability of the post-conviction remedies provided by Sections 2953.21 to>2953.24, inclusive, Revised Code, is ground for denial of” a writ of habeas corpus.
Accordingly, on authority of Freeman v. Maxwell, supra, and for the reasons stated therein, the judgment of the Court of Appeals, dismissing appellant’s complaint for a writ of habeas corpus, is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze:, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755702. Public record. Not legal advice.