# State ex rel. Rockwell International v. Industrial Commission

> Ohio Supreme Court · February 11, 1976 · 45 Ohio St. 2d 96

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755668

## Case

- **Full name:** The State, ex rel. Rockwell International, formerly Rockwell Standard Company Transmission & Axle Plant v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** February 11, 1976
- **Citations:** 45 Ohio St. 2d 96; 74 Ohio Op. 2d 203; 341 N.E.2d 592; 1976 Ohio LEXIS 540
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755668

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Appellant contends, in essence, that there is no competent medical evidence to support the Industrial Commission’s order granting claimant permanent and total disability from a previously allowed claim, thus constituting an abuse of discretion subject to correction by an action in mandamus.
This court has consistently stated that “the determination of disputed factual situations is within the final jurisdiction of the commission, subject to correction by action in mandamus only upon a showing of abuse of discretion * * * [but] where the record contains evidence which supports the commission’s factual findings, this court will not disturb that determination. * # *” (Citations omitted.) State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 282-283 .
Upon a review of the record, this court concurs with the decision of the Court of Appeals below that “thero is sufficient evidence * * * to support a conclusion both that elaimaitt' is permanently and totally disabled and that *98 such disability resulted from the industrial injury involved * * * [and] [t]here is sufficient evidence to support the commission’s finding as to the date of commencement of the permanent total disability.”
As did the Court of Appeals, we conclude that the order of the Industrial Commission herein did not constitute an abuse of discretion.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755668. Public record. Not legal advice.