# State ex rel. Hampton v. Manos

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 12, 1973 · 36 Ohio St. 2d 141

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755183

## Case

- **Full name:** [The State, ex rel.] Hampton v. Manos, Chief Justice
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 12, 1973
- **Citations:** 36 Ohio St. 2d 141; 65 Ohio Op. 2d 339; 304 N.E.2d 597; 1973 Ohio LEXIS 294
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755183

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Relator’s sole contention is that he is unable to appear in the action pending in the Court of Appeals and defend in person and with counsel. He does not allege that he has made any effort to intervene in the Court of Appeals or been denied any participation by that court in the case.
Prohibition lies only where there is no other regular, ordinary and adequate remedy available to- relator. State, ex rel. Nolan, v. ClenDening (1915), 93 Ohio St. 264 .
Relator’s complaint does not state a claim for which relief by prohibition may be granted. Therefore, respondent’s motion to dismiss is sustained and the writ of prohibition is denied.
Writ denied.
O’Neill, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755183. Public record. Not legal advice.