# City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51

> Ohio Supreme Court · July 18, 1973 · 35 Ohio St. 2d 197

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755141

## Case

- **Full name:** City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati District Council 51, American Federation of State, County, Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, Appellants Goldberg
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 18, 1973
- **Citations:** 35 Ohio St. 2d 197; 64 Ohio Op. 2d 129; 299 N.E.2d 686; 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2241; 1973 Ohio LEXIS 330
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Brown
- **Judges:** Brown, Celebrezze, Corrigan, Herbert, Neill, Stern
- **Cited by:** 154 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755141

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding the notice apprised the defendant of the nature of the proceeding as contempt and the reason for the proceeding as violation of an order, regardless of the failure to specify that defendant was accused of thirty-seven different acts of contempt
- finding insufficient notice did not prejudice alleged contemnors who failed to advance any argument about defenses they would have mounted had they been given notice of the additional counts

## Opinion text

W. Brown, J.,
concurs in paragraphs one .and two of the syllabus but dissents from paragraphs three and four of the syllabus and from the judgment.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755141. Public record. Not legal advice.