# State ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial Commission

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 15, 1972 · 32 Ohio St. 2d 257

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755025

## Case

- **Full name:** The State, ex rel. Trydle v. Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant The State, ex rel. Rogers v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 15, 1972
- **Citations:** 32 Ohio St. 2d 257; 61 Ohio Op. 2d 488; 291 N.E.2d 748; 1972 Ohio LEXIS 393
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Schneider
- **Judges:** Brown, Corrigan, Herbert, Leach, Neill, Schneider, Stern, Syllabus
- **Cited by:** 86 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755025

## Opinion text

Schneider, J.,
dissenting. As to case No. 72-394, I would hold that both E. C. 4109.12(D) and E. C. 4109.,-13(E) are specific requirements and therefore applicable to justify the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
As to case No. 72-395, E. C. 4109.12(U) forbids a youngster under 18 to be permitted to work in the operation of a motor vehicle. How specific can words be? The young lady received her injuries in employment directly contrary to this prohibition. She should recover an additional award as a penalty to her employer for his violation of a specific statute. Anything to the contrary in the previous decisions of this court has outlived its propriety.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6755025. Public record. Not legal advice.