# Kilbreath v. Rudy

> Ohio Supreme Court · December 11, 1968 · 16 Ohio St. 2d 70

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6754103

## Case

- **Full name:** Kilbreath v. Rudy, d. b. a. Fair Park Pharmacy Dermik Pharmacal Co., Inc.
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** December 11, 1968
- **Citations:** 16 Ohio St. 2d 70; 45 Ohio Op. 2d 370; 242 N.E.2d 658; 1968 Ohio LEXIS 343
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Taet
- **Judges:** Browrr, Doyle, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Ninth, Schneider, Taet, Zimmerman
- **Cited by:** 76 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6754103

## Opinion text

Taet, C. J.
I dissent because Sections 2307.382 and 2307.383, Revised Code, do not expressly provide that they are to affect causes of action existing at the time of their enactment. See the latter part- of Section 1.20, Revised Code, beginning with the word, “nor,” and Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Rd. Co. v. Hedges (1900), 63 Ohio St. 339 , 58 N. E. 804 .
Doyle, J., of the Ninth Appellate District, sitting for Herbert,. J.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6754103. Public record. Not legal advice.