# Bruder v. Public Utilities Commission

> Ohio Supreme Court · March 27, 1968 · 14 Ohio St. 2d 24

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753965

## Case

- **Full name:** Bruder, d. b. a. Bruder Cartage Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 27, 1968
- **Citations:** 14 Ohio St. 2d 24; 43 Ohio Op. 2d 13; 235 N.E.2d 238; 1968 Ohio LEXIS 411
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zxmmebman
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753965

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
Appellant’s contention, that Rule 1.04 (d) of the Rules and Regulations of the Public Utilities Commission is invalid on the ground that it violates Section 16 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution is without merit.
Upon consideration of the record, this court holds that the order of the commission denying applicant’s application *25 is neither unreasonable nor unlawful. Section 4903.13, Revised Code; H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1939), 135 Ohio St. 145 , 19 N. E. 2d 956; Jones v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 237 , 47 N. E. 2d 780 .
Therefore, the order of the Public Utilities Commission is affirmed.
Order affirmed.
Taft, C. J., ZxmmebmaN, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and BrowN, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753965. Public record. Not legal advice.