# State ex rel. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Rd. v. Court of Common Pleas

> Ohio Supreme Court · July 19, 1967 · 11 Ohio St. 2d 193

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753877

## Case

- **Full name:** The State, ex rel. The Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Rd. Co. v. Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** July 19, 1967
- **Citations:** 11 Ohio St. 2d 193; 40 Ohio Op. 2d 172; 228 N.E.2d 313; 66 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2767; 1967 Ohio LEXIS 351
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753877

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
The instant case in prohibition is before this court on a demurrer to the petition. A ruling on the demurrer is dispositive of the action.
In State, ex rel. Mansfield Telephone Co., v. Mayer et al., Judges, 5 Ohio St. 2d 222, 223 , it is said:
“The rule is firmly established that the Court of Common Pleas is a court of general jurisdiction and, as such, possesses the authority initially to determine its own jurisdiction over both the person and the subject matter in an action before it, subject to the right of appeal; and generally prohibition, an extraordinary remedy entertained with caution, will not lie to prevent an anticipated erroneous judgment.”
The demurrer to the petition is sustained and the writ is denied.
Writ denied.
Taft, C. J., ZimmermaN, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, SchNeider and Brown, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753877. Public record. Not legal advice.