# Oney v. Needham

> Ohio Supreme Court · May 11, 1966 · 6 Ohio St. 2d 154

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753657

## Case

- **Full name:** Oney v. Needham, a Minor
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 11, 1966
- **Citations:** 6 Ohio St. 2d 154; 35 Ohio Op. 2d 223; 216 N.E.2d 625; 1966 Ohio LEXIS 360
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taet, Zimmerman
- **Cited by:** 12 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753657

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
The omission to charge specifically on proximate cause was not called to the trial court’s attention, nor was the court requested to charge thereon. Such an error of omission did not justify the reversal by the Court of Appeals. Rhoades v. City of Cleveland, 157 Ohio St. 107 . The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the other errors assigned in and not passed upon by that court.
Judgment reversed.
Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753657. Public record. Not legal advice.