# State ex rel. Turrin v. County Court

> Ohio Supreme Court · March 2, 1966 · 5 Ohio St. 2d 194

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753598

## Case

- **Full name:** The State, ex rel. Turrin v. County Court of Tuscarawas County, Central District, Appellees The State, ex rel. Hassin v. County Court of Tuscarawas County, Central District
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** March 2, 1966
- **Citations:** 5 Ohio St. 2d 194; 34 Ohio Op. 2d 350; 214 N.E.2d 670; 1966 Ohio LEXIS 409
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Brown, Herbert, Matthias, Neill, Schneider, Taft, Zimmerman
- **Cited by:** 17 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753598

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that time period in R.C. 2938.11[F] is directoiy
- holding that time period in R.C. 2938.11(F) is directory

## Opinion text

Per Curiam.
The dividing by the county commissioners of the area of one township into two townships did not effect a change in the territorial jurisdiction of the County Court. The County Court, Central Area, retains jurisdiction over the area *196 previously designated by the Common Pleas Court, including the area of the new township created totally within the area so previously designated.
In regard to the contention in the Rassin case that Section 2938.11 (F), Revised Code, was not complied with, the petition alleges that the case was submitted on December 14, 1964, at 11 a. m., and the judgment was announced on December 16, 1964, at 2 p. m. The statutory provision is directory and was sufficiently complied with. See City of Columbus v. Nappi, 5 Ohio St. 2d 99 .
Judgments affirmed.
Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O ’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6753598. Public record. Not legal advice.