# Ray v. Board of Liquor Control

> Ohio Court of Appeals · September 11, 1952 · 76 Ohio Law. Abs. 156

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6750586

## Case

- **Full name:** RAY v. BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL et
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** September 11, 1952
- **Citations:** 76 Ohio Law. Abs. 156; 145 N.E.2d 417; 1952 Ohio App. LEXIS 840
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hornbeck, Miller, Wiseman
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6750586

## Opinion text

OPINION
By THE COURT.
Submitted on motion of the appellee seeking an order dismissing the appeal for the reason that the appellants have failed to file their assignments of error and brief in accordance with Rule VII or within the extension of time granted by order of this Court. The appellants admit the facts as stated but urge in their brief they can show good cause for such noncompliance. The grounds set forth are that the failure was due to the press of business and that such failure will cause no delay in the proceedings as the case can be ready for oral argument when the Court convenes for the fall term. This Court has never recognized the excuses offered by the appellants as being good cause for noncompliance with the Rule. See Russell v. State Bridge Commission, 32 Abs 313 ; Brown v. Brown, 35 Abs 527 ; Parrett v. Parrett, 42 Abs 413 ; Golden v. Fogo, 53 Abs 575 ; Rogers v. Rogers, 55 Abs 221 .
The motion will be sustained and the judgment affirmed.
HORNBECK, PJ, WISEMAN and MILLER, JJ, concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6750586. Public record. Not legal advice.