# State v. Tancer

> Ohio Court of Appeals · March 24, 1952 · 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 367

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6749506

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE v. TANCER
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** March 24, 1952
- **Citations:** 62 Ohio Law. Abs. 367
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Hornbeck, Miller, Nichols, Seventh
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6749506

## Opinion text

OPINION
By THE COURT.
Submitted on motion for rehearing. The present rules of court do not provide for a motion or application for rehearing. However, the court will give the motion such attention as the contents require.
A different test is applied in determining whether action taken constitutes “an abuse of discretion” or was against the “manifest weight of the evidence.” Steiner v. Custer, 137 Oh St 448; Shearer v. State Medical Board, 58 Abs 561, 564 .
This Court recently held that the Board of Liquor Control may appeal an adverse ruling from the Common Pleas Court to the Court of Appeals. Barn Cafe & Restaurant, Inc., v. Board of Liquor Control, Case No. '4637, Franklin County, decided January 24, 1952.
Nothing is presented in support of the motion which would require a rehearing.
Motion for rehearing overruled.
HORNBECK, PJ, MILLER, J, and NICHOLS, J, (NICHOLS, J, of the Seventh District, sitting by designation), concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6749506. Public record. Not legal advice.