# Helmer v. Vance

> Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 1937 · 24 Ohio Law. Abs. 259

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6746123

## Case

- **Full name:** HELMER v. VANCE
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** March 15, 1937
- **Citations:** 24 Ohio Law. Abs. 259
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Barnes, Gieger, Hornbeck
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6746123

## Opinion text

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
Decided March 25, 1937
By THE COURT:
The above entitled action is now being determined on appellee’s application for rehearing.
Connected with the motion is the memo of claim and citation of authorities.
We have again examined the authorities cited in the light of the present argument, but still think the case of Norton v Blinn, 39 Oh St 145, is controlling and and determinative of the question herein. In the preparation and release of the original opinion we had in mind and considered all questions now presented through the application for rehearing.
The application will be overruled.
BARNES, PJ and HORNBECK, J, concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6746123. Public record. Not legal advice.