# State v. Anderson

> Court of Appeals of North Carolina · August 5, 1970 · 9 N.C. App. 146

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6729775

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. HORACE ANDERSON
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of North Carolina
- **Decided:** August 5, 1970
- **Citations:** 9 N.C. App. 146; 175 S.E.2d 729; 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1300
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Brock
- **Judges:** Brock, Graham, Morris
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6729775

## Opinion text

Brock, J.,
concurring.
It seems that Britt, J., in writing the opinion for the Court after the first appeal in this case, clearly pointed to the necessity for some explanation of what happened to the original of the note. Yet, the State did not even ask the prosecuting witness what she did with the note. Her answer to that question would likely explain sufficiently the absence of the note.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6729775. Public record. Not legal advice.