# Michael Lynn Brown v. David A. Williams Dave Smith Edward W. Murray Commonwealth of Virginia

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · June 17, 1994 · 27 F.3d 562

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/672611

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** June 17, 1994
- **Citations:** 27 F.3d 562; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 23325; 1994 WL 265904
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/672611

## Opinion text

27 F.3d 562
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Lynn BROWN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
David A. WILLIAMS; Dave Smith; Edward W. Murray;
Commonwealth of Virginia, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6195.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 17, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-93-19).
Michael Lynn Brown, appellant Pro Se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. * Brown v. Williams, No. CA-93-19 (W.D.Va. Feb. 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.
*
Appellant's motion for default judgment is denied

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/672611. Public record. Not legal advice.