# State ex rel. Kauffman v. Brown

> Ohio Supreme Court · October 28, 1924 · 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 676

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6721938

## Case

- **Full name:** The State ex rel Emil J. Kauffman v. Thad H. Brown, Secretary of State, etc.
- **Court:** Ohio Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 28, 1924
- **Citations:** 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 676
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Jones
- **Judges:** Allen, Conn, Day, Jones, Marshall, Matthias, Robinson
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6721938

## Opinion text

JONES, J.
1. Where more than one county committee, each claiming to be the rightful executive committee of a political party, recommends to the state supervisor of elections, different persons for appointment as deputy state supervisor and inspector of elections, a mandatory duty is imposed upon such state supervisor by Section 4808, General Code (99 OL. 288), to notify the chairman of the state central committee of such party of such diverse recommendation. It likewise becomes the duty of the state supervisor to recognize whichever committee such state central committee certifies to be the rightful committee and to appoint the nominee of such certified- committee as a deputy state supervisor and inspector of elections.
2. The fact that such state central eommit-mittee has acted arbitrarily or upon insufficient evidence does not authorize the employment of mandamud against the secretary of state directing him to appoint a person recommended by a county executive committee which has failed to receive the recognition of such state central committee.
Writ denied.
Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Matthias, Day, Allen and Conn, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6721938. Public record. Not legal advice.