# Tucker v. Mecklenburg County Zoning Board of Adjustment

> Supreme Court of North Carolina · February 28, 2003 · 356 N.C. 658

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6717314

## Case

- **Full name:** AMANDA DIXON TUCKER and JIMMY L. HODGES and BECKY J. HODGES v. THE MECKLENBURG COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, MARSHALL GUS THOMAS, JR. and RHONDA GOLDEN-THOMAS
- **Court:** Supreme Court of North Carolina
- **Decided:** February 28, 2003
- **Citations:** 356 N.C. 658; 576 S.E.2d 324; 2003 N.C. LEXIS 39
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6717314

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6717314. Public record. Not legal advice.