# Cecil Fletcher v. National Energy Corporation Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · May 18, 1994 · 25 F.3d 1039

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/670870

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** May 18, 1994
- **Citations:** 25 F.3d 1039; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20903; 1994 WL 197022
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/670870

## Opinion text

25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Cecil FLETCHER, Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL ENERGY CORPORATION; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.
93-1345.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 26, 1994.
Decided May 18, 1994.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (90-1749-BLA)
Cecil Fletcher, Petitioner Pro Se.
Harry Ashby Dickerson, Penn, Stuart, Eskridge & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia; Barbara J. Johnson, Rodger Pitcairn, United States Department of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Ben. Rev. Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Petitioner seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1993). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Fletcher v. National Energy Corp., No. 90-1749-BLA (Feb. 22, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/670870. Public record. Not legal advice.