# State v. Franklin

> Ohio Court of Appeals · June 9, 2009 · 182 Ohio App. 3d 410

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6698287

## Case

- **Full name:** The STATE of Ohio v. FRANKLIN
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** June 9, 2009
- **Citations:** 182 Ohio App. 3d 410; 912 N.E.2d 1197
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by McGrath
- **Judges:** Connor, French, McGrath
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6698287

## Opinion text

McGrath, Judge,
concurring separately.
{¶ 23} Although I agree with the judgment of the court herein, I would find that an analysis of the trial court’s sentence based on an abuse-of-discretion standard is unnecessary, having found that the sentence, by clear and convincing evidence, is compliant with law.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6698287. Public record. Not legal advice.