# Upshur v. West Farm Home Owners Ass'n, Inc.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 4, 1994 · 21 F.3d 426

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/667378

## Case

- **Full name:** Ronald C. Upshur v. West Farm Home Owners Association, Incorporated Chambers Enterprises, Incorporated Roger Real Estate Darlene Brown Lonnie Harrison Sam Ibrahim, and U.S. Home Corporation
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 4, 1994
- **Citations:** 21 F.3d 426; 1994 WL 112761
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/667378

## Opinion text

21 F.3d 426
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald C. UPSHUR, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
WEST FARM HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED; Chambers
Enterprises, Incorporated; Roger Real Estate;
Darlene Brown; Lonnie Harrison; Sam
Ibrahim, Defendants Appellees,
and
U.S. HOME CORPORATION, Defendant.
No. 94-1069.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 4, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-1852-DKC)
Ronald C. Upshur, appellant pro se.
Richard E. Schimel, Budow & Noble, P.C., Bethesda, MD; David Lee Bortz, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from a district court order denying his request that the district judge recuse himself, and denying his request for reconsideration of the court's earlier decision denying his motion for appointment of another attorney. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
2
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/667378. Public record. Not legal advice.