# Brown v. Buckley

> Nebraska Supreme Court · April 9, 1910 · 86 Neb. 572

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6659072

## Case

- **Full name:** Albert Brown v. Daniel Buckley
- **Court:** Nebraska Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 9, 1910
- **Citations:** 86 Neb. 572; 125 N.W. 1086; 1910 Neb. LEXIS 118
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Faaycett
- **Judges:** Faaycett
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6659072

## Opinion text

Faaycett, J.
Daniel Buckley, appellee, applied to the board of trustees of the village of Oconto for a license to sell intoxicating liquors* during the municipal year beginning in May, *573 1908. The village board granted the license. Demonstrator appealed to the district court for Custer county, 'which court on May 13, 1908', confirmed the action of the village board, and dismissed remonstrator’s action. Remonstrator appeals. The transcript on appeal was filed in this court November 11,-1908. No motion to advance the case was ever filed in this court. It therefore appears that the period for which the license was issued has long since expired and that remonstrator’s appeal now presents nothing but moot questions. Following the rule announced in Heesch v. Snyder, 85 Neb. 778 , and in harmony with the authorities there cited, remonstrator’s appeal is
Dismissed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6659072. Public record. Not legal advice.