# United States v. Jerry Lee Smith

> Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · December 7, 1993 · 16 F.3d 1223

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/663464

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- **Decided:** December 7, 1993
- **Citations:** 16 F.3d 1223; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37769; 1993 WL 503098
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/663464

## Opinion text

16 F.3d 1223
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jerry Lee SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-3986.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 7, 1993.
Before: JONES, RYAN, Circuit Judges; and BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
1
One of the issues raised in this appeal is the refusal of the District Court to consider whether certain of defendant's prior convictions are constitutionally valid. Our recent en banc decision in United States v. McGlocklin, No. 91-6121, --- F.3d ----, 1993 WL 356406 (6th Cir., Sept. 17, 1993) (en banc) requires that issue be addressed. We vacate the judgment and remand that issue to the District Court for consideration in light of McGlocklin. 1
2
Accordingly, it is so ORDERED.
1
On October 12, 1993, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Custis v. United States, 988 F.2d 1355 (4th Cir.1993), cert. granted 62 U.S.L.W. 3272 , No. 93-5209 (Oct. 12, 1993), an opinion relied upon by the plurality in McGlocklin

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/663464. Public record. Not legal advice.