# Poole v. Jackson

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · February 4, 1994 · 16 F.3d 411

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/662753

## Case

- **Full name:** Wayne Edward Poole v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. Lewis W. Hurst John A. Brown Gail Y. Brown Jacqueline F. Fraser Edward W. Murray C. D. Larsen L. A. White G. Wilcox S. v. Pruett Marcia Larson J. M. Sisk Steven A. Austin Robert R. Kelly Robert L. Copeland
- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** February 4, 1994
- **Citations:** 16 F.3d 411; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7316; 1994 WL 34482
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/662753

## Opinion text

16 F.3d 411
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Wayne Edward POOLE, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Clarence L. JACKSON, Jr.; Lewis W. Hurst; John A. Brown;
Gail Y. Brown; Jacqueline F. Fraser; Edward W. Murray; C.
D. Larsen; L. A. White; G. Wilcox; S. V. Pruett; Marcia
Larson; J. M. Sisk; Steven A. Austin; Robert R. Kelly;
Robert L. Copeland, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-6783.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided Feb. 4, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-92-87)
Wayne Edward Poole, appellant pro se.
Reneen Evat Hewlett, Office of the Atty. Gen. of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Poole v. Jackson, No. CA-92-87 (E.D. Va. May 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/662753. Public record. Not legal advice.