# Keel v. Brown

> United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · April 25, 1996 · 9 Vet. App. 124

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6613100

## Case

- **Full name:** Thomas W. KEEL v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
- **Court:** United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
- **Decided:** April 25, 1996
- **Citations:** 9 Vet. App. 124; 1996 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 244; 1996 WL 207903
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Holdaway, Nebeker, Steinberg
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6613100

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The counsel who had represented the appellant in the appeal to this Court [hereinafter referred to as “counsel”] advises that the appellant died on February 3, 1995. On July 24, 1995, this Court, unaware of the appellant’s death, vacated the September 17, 1993, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) decision and remanded a matter for readjudication. Keel v. Brown, 8 Vet.App. 82 (1995). On November 9, 1995, counsel filed an application for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d). On the same date, due to the appellant’s death, counsel, noting his unawareness of the appellant’s death at the time of this Court’s July 1995 opinion, moved to substitute Salina Rice, executrix of the appellant’s estate, as the appellant.
On November 29, 1995, citing Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet.App. 42 (1994), this Court ordered counsel to show cause why the Court’s opinion in Keel, supra, should not be withdrawn and its judgment recalled under Lan-dicho, and the instant EAJA application be dismissed. On December 27, 1995, counsel filed a response which included a voluntary withdrawal of the EAJA application. On April 8, 1996, the Court recalled the judgment and mandate and withdrew the July 24, 1995, opinion.
On consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. It is further
ORDERED that counsel’s voluntary withdrawal of the EAJA application filed on December 27, 1995, is duly noted by the Court and accepted as a matter of record as of the date filed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6613100. Public record. Not legal advice.