# In re Smith

> United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · August 30, 1994 · 7 Vet. App. 89

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6612011

## Case

- **Full name:** In re Motion of William G. SMITH, Esquire, to Review a Fee Agreement in Case Number 91-1496
- **Court:** United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
- **Decided:** August 30, 1994
- **Citations:** 7 Vet. App. 89; 1994 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 709; 1994 WL 593077
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Kramer
- **Judges:** Farley, Holdaway, Ivers, Kramer, Mankin, Nebeker, Steinberg
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6612011

## Opinion text

KRAMER, Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the result only.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6612011. Public record. Not legal advice.