# Latham v. Brown

> United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · March 11, 1993 · 4 Vet. App. 269

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6610430

## Case

- **Full name:** Raymond R. LATHAM v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
- **Court:** United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
- **Decided:** March 11, 1993
- **Citations:** 4 Vet. App. 269; 1993 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 97; 1993 WL 76201
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Holdaway, Kramer, Nebeker
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6610430

## Opinion text

ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Shortly before the Court issued its decision in this case, appellant filed an addendum request predicated on grounds different from those which were originally appealed to the Court as discussed in the Court’s decision of February 12, 1992. In essence, appellant argues that he is entitled to pension based on the needs of his family. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.666 (a) (1992). As this issue was not before the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA), it cannot be a subject of this appeal. See Branham v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 93, 94 (1990).
Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the addendum is stricken and the Clerk is to return it to appellant.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6610430. Public record. Not legal advice.