# Brydle v. Honigbaum

> Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · June 5, 1930 · 49 F.2d 963

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6607091

## Case

- **Full name:** Fenton B. Brydle v. Harry H. Honigbaum
- **Court:** Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
- **Decided:** June 5, 1930
- **Citations:** 49 F.2d 963; 18 C.C.P.A. 1517
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bland
- **Judges:** Bland, Boot, Ctraham, Gabbett, Geaham, Hatbteld, Len
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6607091

## Opinion text

Bland, J.,
specially concurring:
I agree with everything said in the opinion except I feel certain that Brydle’s Exhibit 7 was a complete reduction to practice of the “ notched ” shingle, otherwise there would be no necessity for a remand.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6607091. Public record. Not legal advice.