# Lloyd Bennette Swain v. Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. Virginia Parole Board

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · November 18, 1993 · 10 F.3d 806

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/658221

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** November 18, 1993
- **Citations:** 10 F.3d 806; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 35865; 1993 WL 476407
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/658221

## Opinion text

10 F.3d 806
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lloyd Bennette SWAIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Clarence L. JACKSON, JR.; Virginia Parole Board,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-6906.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 25, 1993.
Decided: November 18, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Lloyd Bennette Swain, Appellant Pro Se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
1
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Swain v. Jackson, No. CA-93-602-R (W.D. Va. Aug. 10, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/658221. Public record. Not legal advice.