# Brown v. Nachtrieb

> Supreme Court of Colorado · April 15, 1883 · 6 Colo. 517

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6561121

## Case

- **Full name:** Brown v. Nachtrieb
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Colorado
- **Decided:** April 15, 1883
- **Citations:** 6 Colo. 517
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Beck
- **Judges:** Beck, Took
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6561121

## Opinion text

Beck, O. J.
The rulings of the district court complained of, in and by the first and second assignments of error, involve matters of sound judicial discretion with the exercise of which we must decline to interfere.
The other errors assigned are • equally without merit. The case appears to have been fairly tried, and submitted to the jury upon a correct statement of the law applicable to the facts before it.
The verdict was warranted by the pleadings and the testimony, and a careful examination of the entire record fails to disclose any legal propositions calling for our consideration. The trial appears to have been conducted in accordance with well established legal principles, and the judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Helm took no part in the decision of this cause.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6561121. Public record. Not legal advice.