# MacKintrush v. State

> Court of Appeals of Arkansas · December 22, 1997 · 60 Ark. App. 42

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6552722

## Case

- **Full name:** Walter Ray MacKINTRUSH v. STATE of Arkansas
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Arkansas
- **Decided:** December 22, 1997
- **Citations:** 60 Ark. App. 42; 959 S.W.2d 404; 1997 Ark. App. LEXIS 844
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Areyiii
- **Judges:** Agree, Arey, Bird, Crabtree, Griffen, III, Roaf, Stroud
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6552722

## Opinion text

D. Franklin Arey, III, Judge, concurring. I join with the majority opinion in its result. To the extent that the majority relies on Colbert v. State, 304 Ark. 250 , 801 S.W.2d 643 (1990), I believe that it is on track. However, I believe that Judge Roaf correctly identifies an inconsistency in our interpretation of Bat-son. At some point, our supreme court should address the divergent cases identified by Judge Roaf.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6552722. Public record. Not legal advice.