# May v. Hutson

> Supreme Court of Arkansas · February 21, 1891 · 54 Ark. 226

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6542690

## Case

- **Full name:** May v. Hutson
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Arkansas
- **Decided:** February 21, 1891
- **Citations:** 54 Ark. 226; 15 S.W. 606; 1891 Ark. LEXIS 38
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6542690

## Opinion text

Per Curiam. Amendmentof schedule, The petition for a supesedeas filed by the r * ... appellee is defective in two particulars, viz., it does not state that he is a resident of the State, or that it contains a description of all the defendant’s property, both real and personal. Without the allegations of both facts, it was insufficient to warrant the issuance of a supersedeas. Brown v. Peters, 53 Ark., 182. The petition is subject to amendment. If the facts justify it, both defects may be cured by amendment.
Reverse and remand for further proceedings.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6542690. Public record. Not legal advice.