# State v. Carey-Martin

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · September 6, 2018 · 293 Or. App. 611

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6534934

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Alixandur C. CAREY-MARTIN
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** September 6, 2018
- **Citations:** 293 Or. App. 611; 430 P.3d 98
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by James
- **Judges:** Garrett, James, Ortega
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6534934

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- observing that the defendant’s conduct of “sexting” that resulted in his predicate convictions for using a child in a display of sexually explicit conduct is “much less severe and harmful to * * * victims” than the “offense of rape by forcible compulsion”
- noting that the defendant “neither was physically present when the victims made the nude self-portraits nor was he there to direct them to engage in poses or sexual behavior while he recorded them”
- describing the defendant's conduct

## Opinion text

The text of this opinion is not available in the library.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6534934. Public record. Not legal advice.