# Sharp v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

> Court of Appeals of Oregon · October 17, 2018 · 294 Or. App. 506

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6534686

## Case

- **Full name:** Jeffrey G. SHARP v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Oregon
- **Decided:** October 17, 2018
- **Citations:** 294 Or. App. 506; 427 P.3d 1145
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Aoyagi, Dehoog, Hadlock
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6534686

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM
*507 Under ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges OAR 255-032-0005(2), a rule adopted by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, asserting that the rule is invalid because it violates two constitutional provisions. See ORS 183.400(4) (court shall declare a rule invalid only if the rule violates constitutional provision, exceeds the statutory authority of the agency that adopted the rule, or was adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures). Having reviewed the parties' arguments, we reject petitioner's contentions and conclude that the challenged rule is valid.
OAR 255-032-0005(2) held valid.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6534686. Public record. Not legal advice.