# Dreyfus v. City of Montgomery

> Alabama Court of Appeals · April 9, 1912 · 4 Ala. App. 270

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6521215

## Case

- **Full name:** Dreyfus v. City of Montgomery
- **Court:** Alabama Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** April 9, 1912
- **Citations:** 4 Ala. App. 270; 58 So. 730; 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 298
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** On rehearing
- **Judges:** Pelham
- **Cited by:** 20 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6521215

## Opinion text

On Application for Rehearing.
By consent of counsel for the appellee entered in writing on the appellant’s application for a rehearing, we have considered the propositions argued and insisted upon on their merits, without regard to the fact that there was no assignment of errors on the record. Our conclusions on the merits of the propositions as expressed in the original opinion seem to us to be correct, and we are unwilling to depart from what we there said.
The application is overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6521215. Public record. Not legal advice.