# Brown v. Brown

> Supreme Court of Alabama · December 15, 1880 · 68 Ala. 114

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6510955

## Case

- **Full name:** Brown v. Brown
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Alabama
- **Decided:** December 15, 1880
- **Citations:** 68 Ala. 114
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Stone
- **Judges:** Stone
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6510955

## Opinion text

STONE, J.
If the complainant, Clara Brown, have any interest or estate in the lands, their issues or profits, or any right to occupy them, which she has not forfeited, her remedy at law was adequate and complete. Whatever claim or right- *117 she had, was what tb-e law calls a legal title, or right to the possession; and if not lost by abandonment, there was no impediment to its assertion in answer to the action of ejectment. Having a plain and adequate remedy at law, her bill is without equity.—1 Brick. Dig. 639, section 3.
Reversed, and bill here dismissed. Let the costs, including costs of the appeal in this court and the court below, be paid by Mrs. Clara Á. Brown. This judgment to take effect as of July 16th, 1878, when this cause was submitted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6510955. Public record. Not legal advice.