# Brown, N., Aplt. v. Commonwealth and SCI Somerset

> Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · July 14, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6499886

## Case

- **Court:** Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** July 14, 2022
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Judges:** Per Curiam
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6499886

## Opinion text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT

NOEL BROWN, : No. 60 MAP 2022
Appellant
:
v. : .
:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
AND ERIC TICE, SUPERINTENDENT :
SCI-SOMERSET, :
Appellees :

ORDER

PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 14th day of July, 2022, the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED. See

Pa.R.A.P. 341(b) (definition of a final order); Pa.R.A.P. 311 Note (specifying that Rule

311(c) “does not relate to a transfer under . . . 42 Pa.C.S. §5103 . . . because such a

transfer is not to a ‘court of coordinate jurisdiction’ . . . ; it is intended that there shall be

no right of appeal from a transfer order based on improper subject matter jurisdiction.”).

See also Pa.R.A.P. 910(a)(5) (“Only the questions set forth in the statement, or fairly

comprised therein will ordinarily be considered by the Court.”); PPL Generation, LLC v.

Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., 986 A.2d 48, 58 n. 11 (Pa. 2009) (same).

Appellant’s Application for Leave to Supplement Jurisdictional Statement is

DENIED.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6499886. Public record. Not legal advice.