# Brown v. McClennen ex rel. County of Maricopa

> Arizona Supreme Court · April 26, 2016 · 239 Ariz. 521

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6480132

## Case

- **Full name:** Jason S. BROWN v. The Honorable Crane McCLENNEN, Judge of Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Judge, State of Arizona, Real Party in Interest
- **Court:** Arizona Supreme Court
- **Decided:** April 26, 2016
- **Citations:** 239 Ariz. 521; 737 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17; 373 P.3d 538; 2016 Ariz. LEXIS 117; 2016 WL 1637664
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bales
- **Judges:** Authored, Bales, Berch, Brutinel, Pelander, Timmer
- **Cited by:** 19 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6480132

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that “[c]onsent cannot be given ‘freely and voluntarily’ if the subject of a search merely acquiesces to a claim of lawful authority” (quoting Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548–49 (1968))

## Opinion text

BALES, C.J.,
concurring.
¶ 21 For the reasons noted in my separate opinion in State v. Valenzuela, CR-15-0222-PR, ¶¶ 38-51, 239 Ariz. 299 , 371 P.3d 627 , 2016 WL 1637656 (Ariz. Apr. 26, 2016), I agree that Brown did not voluntarily consent to the search; I otherwise concur in the majority’s opinion here.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6480132. Public record. Not legal advice.