# Ewell v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

> Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County · March 13, 1924 · 4 Pa. D. & C. 455

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6375692

## Case

- **Full name:** Ewell v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund
- **Court:** Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
- **Decided:** March 13, 1924
- **Citations:** 4 Pa. D. & C. 455; 1924 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 281
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Henry
- **Judges:** Henry
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6375692

## Opinion text

Henry, P. J.,
52nd judicial district, specially presiding,
The plaintiff has taken a rule to strike off the appeal in this case taken by the State Workmen’s Insurance Fund from the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The petition for the rule sets forth that no notice of the appeal was given the plaintiff, as required by section 427 of article vi of the Act of June 26,1919, P. L. 642, 655, and this section of the act provides as follows: “The party taking the appeal shall, at the time of taking the appeal, serve upon the adverse party a written notice thereof, setting forth the date of the appeal to the court in which the same is filed, and shall file with his notice of appeal such exceptions to the action of the board as he may desire to take, and shall specify the findings of fact, if any, of the board, or of the referee, sustained by the board, which he alleges to be unsupported by competent evidence.”
There is no denial of this averment, and so it must be taken to be admitted.
This provision of the act is mandatory, and, in the absence of compliance therewith, the appeal must be stricken off.
And now, to wit, March 13, 1924, rule absolute.
NOTE. — See De Marko v. Hiller, 3 D. & C. 533; Neil v. Lee Tire and Rubber Co., 3 D. & C. 811.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6375692. Public record. Not legal advice.