# Frazer Concerned Citizens ex rel. McKenna v. Frazer Transportation Authority

> Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · January 11, 1993 · 153 Pa. Commw. 652

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6374562

## Case

- **Full name:** FRAZER CONCERNED CITIZENS, by Betty McKENNA, Trustee ad litem, Betty McKenna, William M. Kovic, and Lester J. Artinger v. FRAZER TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, Frazer Township and Frazer Board of Supervisors, and A.V. Associates, L.P. Appeal of FRAZER CONCERNED CITIZENS, by Betty McKENNA, Trustee ad litem, Betty McKenna, William M. Kovic, and Lester J. Artinger and Frazer Township and Frazer Board of Supervisors
- **Court:** Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** January 11, 1993
- **Citations:** 153 Pa. Commw. 652; 623 A.2d 863; 1993 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 16; 1993 WL 2989
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by McGinley
- **Judges:** Craig, McGinley, Narick
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6374562

## Opinion text

McGINLEY, Judge,
concurring.
I agree with the majority that where a transportation authority designates a transportation district, the Transportation Partnership Act requires that the governing body approve such a designation by means of an ordinance rather than a resolution. Therefore I concur in the result in this case. *671 However, in view of the determination that the procedure by which this transportation district was established was fatally flawed, I would not reach the substantive question of the propriety of the method used by the authority’s consultants to determine the boundaries of the district, nor do I believe we should review the validity of the assessment formula.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6374562. Public record. Not legal advice.