# Trexler v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

> Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · November 19, 1976 · 27 Pa. Commw. 180

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6363387

## Case

- **Full name:** Sarah H. Trexler v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
- **Court:** Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** November 19, 1976
- **Citations:** 27 Pa. Commw. 180; 365 A.2d 1341; 1976 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 788
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Kramer
- **Judges:** Blatt, Kramer, Wilkinson
- **Cited by:** 28 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6363387

## Opinion text

Dissenting Opinion by
Judge Kramer:
I respectfully dissent on the same grounds, logic, and the law noted in an opinion of this Court in Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Book, 24 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 36 , 354 A.2d 4 (1976). No matter how sympathetic one may be for the mother of a child in need of babysitting assistance, certainly consultation with one or two babysitters should not be used as justification for unemployment benefits upon the employee’s rejection of employment because of the possibility of overtime. I believe the Legislature never intended such a result.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6363387. Public record. Not legal advice.