# Matter of City of Rome v. Board of Assessors

> Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · April 22, 2022 · 2022 NY Slip Op 02746

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6334363

## Case

- **Court:** Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
- **Decided:** April 22, 2022
- **Citations:** 2022 NY Slip Op 02746; 165 N.Y.S.3d 430; 204 A.D.3d 1480
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6334363

## Opinion text

Matter of City of Rome v Board of Assessors ( 2022 NY Slip Op 02746 )
Matter of City of Rome v Board of Assessors
2022 NY Slip Op 02746
Decided on April 22, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on April 22, 2022
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ. (Filed Apr. 22, 2022.)
MOTION NOS. (1071-1072/21) CA 21-00246. CA 21-00944.
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF CITY OF ROME, PETITIONER-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT,
v
BOARD OF ASSESSORS, ASSESSOR OF TOWN OF LEWIS, BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, ADIRONDACK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AND COUNTY OF LEWIS, INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
IN THE MATTER OF CITY OF ROME, PETITIONER-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT,
v
BOARD OF ASSESSORS, ASSESSOR OF TOWN OF LEWIS, BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, ADIRONDACK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT AND COUNTY OF LEWIS, INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6334363. Public record. Not legal advice.