# United States v. Clarence Brown, Jr.

> Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · April 1, 2022

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6329249

## Case

- **Court:** Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
- **Decided:** April 1, 2022
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6329249

## Opinion text

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7734

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE ROBERT BROWN, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cr-00263-MOC-DCK-1)

Submitted: March 29, 2022 Decided: April 1, 2022

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Robert Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

Clarence Robert Brown, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse of

discretion in the district court’s denial of Brown’s motion. See United States v. High, 997

F.3d 181, 185 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. United States v. Brown, No. 3:17-cr-00263-MOC-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C.

Nov. 29, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6329249. Public record. Not legal advice.