# In re Sentry Security, Inc.

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · October 20, 1978 · 259 Pa. Super. 385

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6297401

## Case

- **Full name:** In re SENTRY SECURITY, INC.
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** October 20, 1978
- **Citations:** 259 Pa. Super. 385; 393 A.2d 880; 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3813
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Price
- **Judges:** Cer, Cone, Consideration, Files, Hester, Hoffman, Jacobs, Price, Spaeth, Voort
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6297401

## Opinion text

PRICE, Judge,
concurring:
I concur in the result reached by the majority. I still adhere to my position that the test as annunciated by the majority in In re Application for Private Detective License of Leo A. Harding, Appellant, 246 Pa.Super. 180 , 369 A.2d 871 (1977), is incorrect. However, based upon this record I believe that the appellant has satisfied the requirements as specifically required by the statute.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6297401. Public record. Not legal advice.
