# Periodical Publishers' Service Bureau, Inc. v. Pittsburgh

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · December 8, 1967 · 211 Pa. Super. 315

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6286331

## Case

- **Full name:** Periodical Publishers' Service Bureau, Inc. v. Pittsburgh
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** December 8, 1967
- **Citations:** 211 Pa. Super. 315; 235 A.2d 827; 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 775
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Montgomery
- **Judges:** Ervin, Hoffman, Jacobs, Montgomery, Spaulding, Watkins, Wright
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6286331

## Opinion text

Dissenting Opinion by
Montgomery, J.:
I respectfully dissent from the action being taken by the majority of this Court in affirming the orders of the lower court.
The issue in these cases is not whether the appellant is doing business in the City of Pittsburgh, but is whether it is a vendor or dealer as distinguished from a broker. General Foods Corporation v. Pittsburgh, 383 Pa. 244 , 118 A. 2d 572 (1955).
On the stipulation of facts filed in lieu of testimony, it clearly appears to me that the taxpayer was not a vendor or dealer in magazines. It merely solicited subscriptions to magazines which were subject to acceptance by the publishers. No magazines passed through its hands nor was it a party to any contract with the subscribers.
I would reverse on the authority of Tax Review Board v. Elster & Prager, 406 Pa. 543 , 178 A. 2d 611 (1962), and Jones v. Pittsburgh, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 154 , 106 A. 2d 892 (1954).

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/6286331. Public record. Not legal advice.